Central States Archaeological Societies
Central States Archaeological Societies
Connect with CSASI on facebook

The Difference Between Historic and Prehistoric “Old Copper”

by E.J. Neiburger

Central States Archaeological Societies 2021 January Journal

Waukegan, Illinois

Too often copper artifacts from historic times get confused with prehistoric copper artifacts. There is a great need to be able to tell them apart. Since most prehistoric relics are more rare and valuable than historic specimens, it would be helpful to look at the two groups scientifically and practically for proper identification.

HISTORIC-PREHISTORIC

For the purpose of this paper, “HISTORIC” artifacts are those made after the advent of writing (history). “PREHISTORIC” refers to artifacts made prior to writing; thus before history. Since writing began in the Old World around 3000 BC (Mesopotamia, Old Kingdom Egypt) and this early writing never traveled to the New World, we consider North American “HISTORIC” times to be around AD 1492 (first European contact) and later. “PREHISTORIC” is anytime before 1492 AD.

Of course there is some substantial evidence that literate Vikings visited the New World around AD 1000 and thus, their copper tools and written language could push back the HISTORIC date 492 years. This is a minor exception to the general rule besides the Viking’s copper artifacts and writings were few in number and geographically isolated.

DETERMINING PREHISTORIC FROM HISTORIC IMPLEMENTS

The Old Copper Culture existed in Northern, Midwestern and Eastern North America from early Archaic times (circa 8000 BC) to the present. Large deposits of 99.9% pure copper (called float or native copper) were found as surface glacial deposits and in shallow pits that were easily mined (Fig. 1). Hundreds of tons of this native copper was collected and used to make tools, ornaments and weapons in a wide variety of shapes and sizes over the last 8000 years ( Figures 1-14).

Though there are a few specimens of native copper with silver, arsenic and other inclusions (isolated pockets of the metal inside the main specimen), the vast majority of float copper used in implement manufacture was 99.9% pure; a condition unique to North America.

This excerpt from "The Difference Between Historic and Prehistoric “Old Copper”" published in the 2021 Central States Archaeological Societies 2021 January Journal

Read this and mores in the Central States Archaeological 2021 January Journal which can be purchased on-line after March 2022

The Difference Between Historic and Prehistoric “Old Copper”
 
Figure 1. (1) Various products from the prehistoric Old Copper Culture. (2) Float-native copper with some specimens hammered and basic tools made. (3) Note chisel and awl with "worm track" elevations on the surfaces.
 

After European contact (AD 1492+), these deposits were continuously mined/collected by the local natives and colonial mining companies from 1843 through the 1930s. Local farmers and those in the “reproduction” trade used this valuable and plentiful copper resource for their own needs. Float copper collection, mining and manufacture occurred in both prehistoric and historic times.

Thus, if you....

 

Read other great columns in the Central States Archaeological Societies 2021 January Journal which can be purchased on-line after March 2020