Central States Archaeological Societies
Central States Archaeological Societies
Connect with CSASI on facebook

Bannerstones: A Rebuttal to the Spear-Mounted Hypothesis

by Larry Kinsella

Central States Archaeological Societies 2019 July Journal

Fairview Heights, Illinois

This is an excerpt from "Bannerstones: A Rebuttal to the Spear-Mounted Hypothesis".

Read the complete 3 page column in the Central States Archaeological Societies 2019 July Journal which can be purchased on-line after March 2020

Bannerstones: A Rebuttal to the Spear-Mounted Hypothesis
Figure 1. Pictured is one of the atlatl, bannerstone, and dart, combinations the author (Kinsella) has made. Note the thickness of the ends. The distal end is the thickest and the proximal, the thinnest. The addition of the stone point and foreshaft make the distal end even heavier. The feather fletching provides “drag”, allowing it to “fly true. ”

 


While reading my recent copy of the Central States Archaeological Journal, I encountered an article on bannerstones being attached to spears and not atlatls. When I read the article I realized that it contained many errors and misstatements. So, I looked at the author’s name (David J. Vohlken), read his bibliography and found that he had written at least two previous articles on the same subject. Those previous articles were also rife with errors, misinterpretations, and misinformation. Having experimented and written about this subject over the last 38 years, I decided to write the following rebuttals.

In order to keep things as orderly as possible, I have quoted the author verbatim (in the order the articles were published) then, written my rebuttal below his quotes (I found other errors but have only written rebuttals concerning the main issues, as I see them).

Bannerstone Facts and Fancy: A Case for Spear Mounted Bannerstones: (Vohlken-2014)

Quoting Mr. Volhken:
“ Spears have been used for thousands of years with and without spear-throwers or atlatls. At some point in prehistory, allegedly, 4,000+ years ago, objects today known as bannerstones became associated with the act of spear-throwing by virtue of being discovered along with other spear-related artifacts dating back to that time.”

Rebuttal: Bannerstones have never been found with “spear-related artifacts.” They have, however, been found in direct association with atlatl-related artifacts at Indian Knoll, Chiggerville, Carlson-Annis, and Read. Those were Archaic Shell Mounds in Kentucky. There have been several other shell-preserved sites also. The conditions in shell mounds are unique. The alkalinity of the shells neutralizes the acidity of the Kentucky soils, preserving antler, shell, and other easily-decayed materials for up to 7,000 years. Many other atlatl components were found at Indian Knoll (and the other sites). They were buried in the mound matrix, not necessarily in direct association. However, their indirect association with bannerstones cannot be disregarded.

 



   
Read the complete column in the Central States Archaeological Societies 2019 July Journal which can be purchased on-line after March 2020